Which One Feels Better to Ride – Royal Enfield Hunter or Classic 350?
Royal Enfield is a well-recognised bike brand which has been making strong and stylish motorcycles for many years. Among its popular models, the Hunter 350 and the Classic 350 stand out. Even though both bikes come from the same brand and share the same engine size, they are made for different kinds of riders. Royal Enfield Classic 350 comes with a known for its old-school charm and relaxed riding style. While the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is modern, light, and built for fun city rides. Let’s take a closer look at how they feel to ride and which one might be the better choice.
A Simple Guide to Help You Decide
Royal Enfield brand bikes have a special place in the hearts of many riders in India. Among their wide range of motorcycles, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the Royal Enfield Classic 350 are two of the most talked-about options today. These two motorbikes comes with strong engines, attractive designs, and great road presence. But when it comes to choosing one, many people wonder: Which one feels better to ride? We will talk about engine performance, mileage, speed, design, comfort, fuel capacity, and more.
Engine and Performance
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has a 349.34cc engine producing 20.2 bhp at 6100 rpm and 27 Nm at 4000 rpm. However, the way that power feels while riding is different. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 offers a mileage of 36.2 kmpl and the top speed it runs on is 130 km/h.
The Royal Enfield Classic 350 has a 349cc engine that makes a 20.2 bhp at 6100 rpm and 27 Nm torque. The mileage of this bike is 35 kmpl, and the top speed it gives is 131 km/h. The compression ratio of this bike is 9.5:1.
Design and Comfort
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350, in contrast, has a more modern and compact design. It is smaller in size, looks sportier, and feels younger. The seating position is slightly leaned forward, giving it a street-bike feel. It’s comfortable for short to medium rides but may not be as relaxing as the Classic during long-distance trips.
The Royal Enfield Classic 350 carries a timeless, vintage design. In context to that, features a tall and wide body with metal fenders and a teardrop-shaped fuel tank. The seat is soft and wide, offering great comfort for both the rider and pillion. Additionally, the riding posture is upright, which makes it easier on your back and shoulders during long rides.
Fuel Tank Capacity and Practicality
When it comes to fuel tank size, the Royal Enfield Classic 350 has a slightly bigger tank. It comes with a 13-litre fuel capacity, which is handy for longer rides without needing to stop for petrol too often. This makes it a better option for touring or highway riding.
The Hunter 350 has a slightly smaller 12-litre tank. But for daily use and short city rides, this is usually not a big issue. Rather than fuel capacity this brand Hunter 350 comes equipped with 2.6-litre of fuel reserve option.
Instrument Cluster and Features
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 features a semi-digital instrument console that includes a digital tripmeter, fuel gauge, and a clear LCD display. Hunter 350 comes with a digital tachometer and clock, making it easier for riders to keep track of time and engine speed while riding. The bike is equipped with useful indicators like low oil, low battery, and service due reminders, adding to rider convenience.
The Royal Enfield Classic 350 comes with a semi-digital console that combines an analogue speedometer with a digital display for added clarity. It includes a digital odometer and tripmeter, making it simple for riders to track distances during both daily rides and long trips. The fuel gauge is also digital, helping you keep an easy check on fuel levels without any guesswork while on the go.
Final Thought:
The best way to choose between the two is to take a test ride of both. See which one makes you feel more confident and comfortable. Whether you pick the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 or the Royal Enfield Classic 350, you are choosing a machine that offers real character, strong build, and the joy of riding.
